REFERENCE LOG / VERIFIED INPUTS

SCIENTIFIC SOURCES

Real research supports ecological principles. The planet and organisms remain fictional.

🧪 REAL SCIENCE

NASA Astrobiology

Extremophiles and life in environments challenging Earth-based assumptions.

In-text citation: (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, n.d.)

APA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.). Astrobiology. Retrieved October 1, 2026, from https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/

VISIT SOURCE

🧪 REAL SCIENCE

NASA Science

Planetary environments, habitability and physical conditions shaping worlds.

In-text citation: (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, n.d.)

APA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.). NASA Science. Retrieved October 1, 2026, from https://science.nasa.gov/

VISIT SOURCE

🧪 REAL SCIENCE

IPCC

Evidence for environmental change, ecosystems, resources and biodiversity.

In-text citation: (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, n.d.)

APA: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (n.d.). IPCC. Retrieved October 1, 2026, from https://www.ipcc.ch/

VISIT SOURCE

🧪 REAL SCIENCE

UN Water / FAO

Real-world context for freshwater pressure, food systems and sustainable resource use.

In-text citation: (UN-Water, n.d.)

APA: UN-Water. (n.d.). UN-Water. Retrieved October 1, 2026, from https://www.unwater.org/

VISIT SOURCE

FICTION VS REAL SCIENCE

👽 FICTIONAL PLANET Planet 190821010214, its species, thermal field, trillion-degree temperatures and model numbers are invented. 🧪 REAL SCIENCE NASA, IPCC and UN sources support only the real principles. 📊 FICTIONAL MODEL DATA Colony projections are an explicitly fictional model.